@article{oai:nied-repo.bosai.go.jp:00007086,
 author = {佐伯, 琢磨},
 issue = {61},
 journal = {主要災害調査, Natural Disaster Research Report},
 month = {Apr},
 note = {This report compares and discusses earthquake insurance and public support in the event of a disaster in Turkey and Japan. In Turkey, the government has traditionally provided generous compensation for damage caused by earthquakes (housingrelated). After the 1999 Izmit earthquake, the Turkish government, in collaboration with the World Bank, launched the TCIP, recognizing the need for an alternative to continuing to solely shoulder the risks arising from earthquake damage. On the other hand in Japan, in 1966, the Earthquake Insurance Law was enacted, and an earthquake insurance system was established based on this law. In 1998, the "Disaster Victims Livelihood Reconstruction Support Act" was enacted by a lawmaker, and later, it was expanded. As a result, it was found that there is something to be learned from each other, as the two systems have different structures and each has its own advantages and disadvantages., 本稿では，トルコと日本における地震保険と災害時の公的支援について比較・検討した．トルコでは伝統的に，地震による住宅関連の損害に対して，政府が手厚い補償を行ってきた．1999 年のイズミット地震の後，トルコ政府は世界銀行と協力して，地震被害から生じるリスクを単独で負担し続けるのではなく，代替案の必要性を認識してTCIP (the Turkish Catastrophe Insurance Pool) を立ち上げた．一方，日本では1966 年に地震保険法が制定され，この法律に基づく地震保険制度が創設された．1995 年の阪神・淡路大震災の教訓から，1998 年に議員立法によって「被災者生活再建支援法」が成立し，その後，拡大された．結論として，トルコと日本の2 つのシステムには，それぞれに長所と短所があり，お互いに学ぶべきことがあることが明らかになった．, (ONLINE先行公開につき、ページ数は仮のものになります。引用にはDOIをご利用ください)},
 pages = {1--4},
 title = {Comparison of Earthquake Insurance and Public Support during Disasters in Turkey and Japan},
 year = {2025},
 yomi = {サエキ, タクマ}
}