ログイン サインアップ
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "6aaf5f14-0950-4eb6-8245-b9d31b872176"}, "_deposit": {"id": "4807", "owners": [1], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "4807"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nied-repo.bosai.go.jp:00004807", "sets": []}, "author_link": [], "item_10001_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2017", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "V003T03A086", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "PVP2016-63416,", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 3", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10001_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Based on the lessons learned from the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, it is recognized the importance of the risk assessment and mitigation for failure consequences to avoid catastrophic failure of pressure equipment during severe accidents (SA) and excessive earthquake.\nThe objectives of structural design (from the first layer to the third layer of the defense-in-depth) is strength confirmation under assumed loading conditions. On the other hand, ones of risk assessment and mitigation (the forth layer of the defense in-depth) is prediction of realistic failure scenarios.\nThrough investigation of failure locations and modes of main components under both severe accident and excessive earthquake, different failure modes from DBE(Design Basis Events) were identified for BDBE(Beyond Design Basis Events). To clarify these modes, the failure mechanisms were studied with some strength experiments.\nFor most of failure modes, their dominant parameters are inelastic strain rather than stress. So that large scale inelastic analysis methods were studied and extended to very high temperature and large strain.\nBy using above results, this paper has proposed the new structural analysis approach for risk assessment under BDBE. This is the extension of \"design by analysis\" concept. However it is clearly different from design approach from next viewpoints.\n(1) Additional failure modes to design condition\nSuch additional failure modes induced by excessive loadings are considered for as local failure, creep rupture, creep buckling, ratcheting collapse and so on.\n(2) Identification of dominant failure modes\nDesign codes require conservative evaluation against all of assumed failure modes. On the other hand, risk assessment needs adequate failure scenarios, where failure locations, modes and their order are important. For that reason, dominant failure modes have to be identified. To identify dominant modes, failure mode map concept was proposed.\n(3) Best estimation\nTo estimate realistic accident phenomena, the best estimation is required. Therefore, dominant strength parameters and criteria without safety margins should be adopted. Through strength mechanism investigations, plastic and creep strain are recognized as more dominant parameters than stress for many failure modes. So that realistic inelastic analyses are recommended for BDBE.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10001_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_10001_relation_14": {"attribute_name": "DOI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "10.1115/PVP2016-63416"}}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Naoto Kasahara", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Izumi Nakamura", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Hideo Machida", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Koji Okamoto", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Takuya Sato", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_title": "STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER BDBE", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER BDBE", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "40001", "owner": "1", "path": ["1670839190650"], "permalink_uri": "https://nied-repo.bosai.go.jp/records/4807", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2023-03-30"}, "publish_date": "2023-03-30", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "4807", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER BDBE"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. 防災科研関係論文

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER BDBE

https://nied-repo.bosai.go.jp/records/4807
https://nied-repo.bosai.go.jp/records/4807
8f66ee79-57dd-458a-9439-4ba15ba9b7e7
Item type researchmap(1)
公開日 2023-03-30
タイトル
言語 en
タイトル STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER BDBE
言語
言語 eng
著者 Naoto Kasahara

× Naoto Kasahara

en Naoto Kasahara

Search repository
Izumi Nakamura

× Izumi Nakamura

en Izumi Nakamura

Search repository
Hideo Machida

× Hideo Machida

en Hideo Machida

Search repository
Koji Okamoto

× Koji Okamoto

en Koji Okamoto

Search repository
Takuya Sato

× Takuya Sato

en Takuya Sato

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Based on the lessons learned from the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, it is recognized the importance of the risk assessment and mitigation for failure consequences to avoid catastrophic failure of pressure equipment during severe accidents (SA) and excessive earthquake.
The objectives of structural design (from the first layer to the third layer of the defense-in-depth) is strength confirmation under assumed loading conditions. On the other hand, ones of risk assessment and mitigation (the forth layer of the defense in-depth) is prediction of realistic failure scenarios.
Through investigation of failure locations and modes of main components under both severe accident and excessive earthquake, different failure modes from DBE(Design Basis Events) were identified for BDBE(Beyond Design Basis Events). To clarify these modes, the failure mechanisms were studied with some strength experiments.
For most of failure modes, their dominant parameters are inelastic strain rather than stress. So that large scale inelastic analysis methods were studied and extended to very high temperature and large strain.
By using above results, this paper has proposed the new structural analysis approach for risk assessment under BDBE. This is the extension of "design by analysis" concept. However it is clearly different from design approach from next viewpoints.
(1) Additional failure modes to design condition
Such additional failure modes induced by excessive loadings are considered for as local failure, creep rupture, creep buckling, ratcheting collapse and so on.
(2) Identification of dominant failure modes
Design codes require conservative evaluation against all of assumed failure modes. On the other hand, risk assessment needs adequate failure scenarios, where failure locations, modes and their order are important. For that reason, dominant failure modes have to be identified. To identify dominant modes, failure mode map concept was proposed.
(3) Best estimation
To estimate realistic accident phenomena, the best estimation is required. Therefore, dominant strength parameters and criteria without safety margins should be adopted. Through strength mechanism investigations, plastic and creep strain are recognized as more dominant parameters than stress for many failure modes. So that realistic inelastic analyses are recommended for BDBE.
言語 en
書誌情報 en : PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 3

巻 PVP2016-63416,, 号 V003T03A086, 発行日 2017
出版者
言語 en
出版者 AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
DOI
関連識別子 10.1115/PVP2016-63416
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-03-31 02:03:47.156415
Show All versions

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3

Change consent settings


Powered by WEKO3

Change consent settings