ログイン サインアップ
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "16acc3ba-7361-4f45-b25a-6a39ce6709be"}, "_deposit": {"id": "4817", "owners": [1], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "4817"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nied-repo.bosai.go.jp:00004817", "sets": []}, "author_link": [], "item_10001_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2020-08-03", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "Volume 3: Design and Analysis", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10001_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "\u003ctitle\u003eAbstract\u003c/title\u003e\n As a lesson learned from the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, the industry recognized the imporatance of mitigating accident consequences after Beyond Design Basis Events (BDBE). We propose the concept of applying fracture control to mitigate failure consequences of nuclear components under BDBE.\n\n\n Requirements are different between Design Basis Events (DBE) and BDBE. In the case of DBE, it requires preventing occurrence of failures, and thus, its structural approach is strengthening. On the other hand, BDBE requires mitigating failure consequences. The simple strengthening approach with DBE is inappropriate for this BDBE requirement.\n\n\n As the structural strengthening approach for mitigating failure consequences, we propose applying the concept of fracture control. The fundamental idea is to control the sequence of failure locations and modes. Preceding failures release loadings and prevent further catastrophic consequent failures. At the end, locations and modes of failure are limited.\n\n\n Absolute strength evaluation for each failure mode is not easy especially for BDBE. Fracture control, however, requires only relative strength evaluation among different locations and failure modes.\n\n\n Our paper discusses two sample applications of our proposed method. One is a fast reactor vessel under severe accident conditions. Our method controls the upper part of a vessel above the liquid coolant surface weaker than the lower part. This strength control maintains enough coolant even after a high pressure and high temperature condition causes failure of the reactor vessel because structural failure in the upper part releases internal pressure to protect the lower part.\n\n\n The other example is the piping under a large earthquake. Our proposal controls strength of supports weaker than the piping itself. When the supports fail first, natural frequencies of piping systems drop. When the natural frequencies of dominant modes are lower than the peak frequency of seismic loads, seismic loads hardly transfer to the piping and catastrophic failures such as collapse or break are avoided.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10001_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "American Society of Mechanical Engineers", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_10001_relation_14": {"attribute_name": "DOI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "10.1115/pvp2020-21072"}}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Naoto Kasahara", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Takashi Wakai", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Izumi Nakamura", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Takuya Sato", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Masakazu Ichimiya", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_title": "Application of Fracture Control to Mitigate Failure Consequence Under BDBE", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Application of Fracture Control to Mitigate Failure Consequence Under BDBE", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "40001", "owner": "1", "path": ["1670839190650"], "permalink_uri": "https://nied-repo.bosai.go.jp/records/4817", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2023-03-30"}, "publish_date": "2023-03-30", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "4817", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Application of Fracture Control to Mitigate Failure Consequence Under BDBE"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. 防災科研関係論文

Application of Fracture Control to Mitigate Failure Consequence Under BDBE

https://nied-repo.bosai.go.jp/records/4817
https://nied-repo.bosai.go.jp/records/4817
4e423a3c-bbce-48b6-b145-d5c3b6c902a2
Item type researchmap(1)
公開日 2023-03-30
タイトル
言語 en
タイトル Application of Fracture Control to Mitigate Failure Consequence Under BDBE
言語
言語 eng
著者 Naoto Kasahara

× Naoto Kasahara

en Naoto Kasahara

Search repository
Takashi Wakai

× Takashi Wakai

en Takashi Wakai

Search repository
Izumi Nakamura

× Izumi Nakamura

en Izumi Nakamura

Search repository
Takuya Sato

× Takuya Sato

en Takuya Sato

Search repository
Masakazu Ichimiya

× Masakazu Ichimiya

en Masakazu Ichimiya

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 <title>Abstract</title>
As a lesson learned from the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, the industry recognized the imporatance of mitigating accident consequences after Beyond Design Basis Events (BDBE). We propose the concept of applying fracture control to mitigate failure consequences of nuclear components under BDBE.


Requirements are different between Design Basis Events (DBE) and BDBE. In the case of DBE, it requires preventing occurrence of failures, and thus, its structural approach is strengthening. On the other hand, BDBE requires mitigating failure consequences. The simple strengthening approach with DBE is inappropriate for this BDBE requirement.


As the structural strengthening approach for mitigating failure consequences, we propose applying the concept of fracture control. The fundamental idea is to control the sequence of failure locations and modes. Preceding failures release loadings and prevent further catastrophic consequent failures. At the end, locations and modes of failure are limited.


Absolute strength evaluation for each failure mode is not easy especially for BDBE. Fracture control, however, requires only relative strength evaluation among different locations and failure modes.


Our paper discusses two sample applications of our proposed method. One is a fast reactor vessel under severe accident conditions. Our method controls the upper part of a vessel above the liquid coolant surface weaker than the lower part. This strength control maintains enough coolant even after a high pressure and high temperature condition causes failure of the reactor vessel because structural failure in the upper part releases internal pressure to protect the lower part.


The other example is the piping under a large earthquake. Our proposal controls strength of supports weaker than the piping itself. When the supports fail first, natural frequencies of piping systems drop. When the natural frequencies of dominant modes are lower than the peak frequency of seismic loads, seismic loads hardly transfer to the piping and catastrophic failures such as collapse or break are avoided.
言語 en
書誌情報 en : Volume 3: Design and Analysis

発行日 2020-08-03
出版者
言語 en
出版者 American Society of Mechanical Engineers
DOI
関連識別子 10.1115/pvp2020-21072
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-03-31 02:03:57.338902
Show All versions

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3

Change consent settings


Powered by WEKO3

Change consent settings