{"_buckets": {"deposit": "dd59192c-4fef-4f37-9197-d67c9b04ed37"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 7, "id": "6862", "owners": [7], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "6862"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nied-repo.bosai.go.jp:00006862", "sets": []}, "author_link": [], "item_10001_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2024", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "4R3-OS-8b-03", "bibliographicPageEnd": "4", "bibliographicPageStart": "1", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "38", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "人工知能学会全国大会論文集", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Proceedings of the Annual Conference of JSAI", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10001_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "本研究の目的は，公共的討議場面を念頭におき，そこでの議論内容に議論フレームが与える影響を明らかにすることである。公共的討議に参加する市民は多元的な共通善を満遍なく議論するとともに，影響を受ける複数の主体にも配慮することが求められる。ただし，実際に人々がそのように議論できるかは討議の場のデザインに依存する。本研究ではその一つとして議論フレームに着目した。共通善への言及や影響を受ける主体への配慮と，議論フレームの関係について検討するために，係争的なフレームと包摂的なフレームの二条件を設け，集団討議実験を行った。分析には，質問紙データと，討議の質評価指標 (DQI) を用いた。DQIは議論に参加していない第三者が，議論中の発話ごとに，評定項目の基準に該当する発言かを評価するものである。実験の結果，共通善への言及には条件間で差がみられなかった。一方，影響を受ける主体への配慮は，包摂的なフレームでは個人が支持する立場に関わらず同様に配慮がなされたが，係争的なフレームでは個人が支持する立場によって配慮される主体が異なっていた。本研究の知見は，公共的討議において熟議がなされやすい要件の一端を提供した。", "subitem_description_language": "ja", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}, {"subitem_description": "This study aimed to clarify the effect of the discussion frame on the discourse in public deliberation. Citizens participating in public deliberation are requested to discuss multiple common goods and consider parties affected by the decision. However, it is not easy to do so. Therefore, we focused on the discussion frame as a factor determining the deliberative decision. To explore the effects of the discussion frame on the statements and decisions, we conducted a group discussion experiment manipulating discussion frames, i.e., the controversial and the comprehensive frames. For the analysis, we used the questionnaire and Discourse Quality Index (DQI). The results suggested that the discussion frame had no effect on the reference to common goods. However, the consideration for affected parties differed by conditions, indicating that participants in the comprehensive frame considered the affected parties even when opposed to their opinions. This study contributed to providing a condition promoting deliberation.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10001_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "一般社団法人 人工知能学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_10001_relation_14": {"attribute_name": "DOI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "10.11517/pjsai.jsai2024.0_4r3os8b03"}}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "相馬 ゆめ", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Yume Souma", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "植 穗奈美", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Honami Ue", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "柴田 侑秀", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Yukihide Shibata", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "辻本 光英", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Mie Tsujimoto", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "崔 青林", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Qinglin Cui", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "中澤 高師", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Takashi Nakazawa", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "辰巳 智行", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Tomoyuki Tatsumi", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "有馬 淑子", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Yoshiko Arima", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "大沼 進", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Susumu Ohnuma", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_title": "討議の質指標（DQI）を用いた多元的共通善および影響を受ける主体への配慮に関する比較", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "討議の質指標（DQI）を用いた多元的共通善および影響を受ける主体への配慮に関する比較", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "Examining the effect of discussion frame on the contents in public deliberation using a group discussion experiment: Comparison analysis of multiple common goods and consideration for affected parties using the Discourse Quality Index (DQI)", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "40001", "owner": "7", "path": ["1670839190650"], "permalink_uri": "https://nied-repo.bosai.go.jp/records/6862", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2025-04-28"}, "publish_date": "2025-04-28", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "6862", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["討議の質指標（DQI）を用いた多元的共通善および影響を受ける主体への配慮に関する比較"], "weko_shared_id": -1}