ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 防災科研関係論文

Comparative Evaluation of Site Response Analysis Methods in Lima City: Case of the 2021 (M <sub> <i>w</i> </sub> 6.0) Mala Earthquake

https://nied-repo.bosai.go.jp/records/7512
https://nied-repo.bosai.go.jp/records/7512
cc36ed5f-cbb5-49c1-b817-8d3602063063
Item type researchmap(1)
公開日 2026-04-20
タイトル
言語 en
タイトル Comparative Evaluation of Site Response Analysis Methods in Lima City: Case of the 2021 (M <sub> <i>w</i> </sub> 6.0) Mala Earthquake
言語
言語 eng
著者 Cinthia Calderon

× Cinthia Calderon

en Cinthia Calderon

Search repository
Zenon Aguilar

× Zenon Aguilar

en Zenon Aguilar

Search repository
Gerson Carrasco

× Gerson Carrasco

en Gerson Carrasco

Search repository
Juan C. Tarazona

× Juan C. Tarazona

en Juan C. Tarazona

Search repository
Carlos Gonzales

× Carlos Gonzales

en Carlos Gonzales

Search repository
Diana Calderon

× Diana Calderon

en Diana Calderon

Search repository
Fernando Lázares

× Fernando Lázares

en Fernando Lázares

Search repository
Nelson Pulido

× Nelson Pulido

en Nelson Pulido

Search repository
Hiroe Miyake

× Hiroe Miyake

en Hiroe Miyake

Search repository
Hiroaki Yamanaka

× Hiroaki Yamanaka

en Hiroaki Yamanaka

Search repository
Hisao Kondo

× Hisao Kondo

en Hisao Kondo

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 The seismic response evaluation of soil deposits in Metropolitan Lima requires analysis methods that can capture local amplification effects, owing to the region’s complex alluvial stratigraphy and high seismicity. This study performs a comparative assessment of four site response analysis methods using records from the 2021 Mala (M <sub> w </sub> 6.0) earthquake, located south of Lima: (1) normative amplification factors (NAF E.030), (2) ground motion models (GMM), (3) average amplification factors (AAF), and (4) one-dimensional wave propagation analysis (1DPA). Performance was evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE) between observed and predicted response spectra as the primary accuracy metric. A total of 31 accelerographic stations were analyzed, classified by time-averaged shear wave velocity of the top 30 m soil layers (V <sub> s </sub> 30) into three categories: stiff (S1’: 550–800 m/s), intermediate (S2 <sup>′</sup> : 350–550 m/s), and soft (S3’: 200–350 m/s) soils. Linear elastic soil behavior was confirmed through 1DPA, indicating maximum shear strains below 0.01% across all sites, well within the elastic threshold. The results revealed that 1DPA analysis produced the most accurate estimates, with average RMSE values of 27.4 cm/s <sup>2</sup> for S1’ soils and 38.5 cm/s <sup>2</sup> for S2’ soils. NAF E.030 performed well in 8 out of 10 stiff soil sites (RMSE =33.1 cm/s <sup>2</sup> ), however, exhibited significant limitations in softer soils where RMSE values exceeded 37 cm/s <sup>2</sup> . GMM and AAF methods demonstrated RMSE values ranging from 44.8 to 51.4 cm/s <sup>2</sup> , with reduced accuracy in long-period ranges (&gt;1.0 s) and S3’ soil sites. These findings highlight the need to revise current normative amplification factors for soft soils and support the implementation of 1DPA analysis in areas with complex stratigraphy or deep sedimentary deposits, thereby contributing to improved seismic-resistant design practices in Metropolitan Lima.
言語 en
書誌情報 en : Journal of Disaster Research

巻 20, 号 6, p. 886-898, 発行日 2025-12-01
出版者
言語 en
出版者 Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ EISSN
収録物識別子 1883-8030
DOI
関連識別子 10.20965/jdr.2025.p0886
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2026-04-20 02:54:20.516866
Show All versions

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3

Change consent settings


Powered by WEKO3

Change consent settings